Tools
Carbon Capture Costs: FEED & pre-FEED Cost Reports
Carbon capture costs from pre-FEED and FEED studies across power, cement, steel, natural gas, hydrogen and other industrial sectors. Browse capital (capex) and operating (opex) cost estimates from publicly available engineering reports, drill down into cost buckets and line items, and compare up to three projects side-by-side.
Comparing 3 reports — tab selection applies to every column.
Finnish Market Pulp Mill / Capture of CO2 in both Kraft Boiler & Lime Kiln
Pulp and Paperpre-FEED· VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland· 2016-12-01Project page ↗Cost report ↗
CO₂ captured
1,675,922t/yr
Capture efficiency
90.0%
Utilization
95.9%
Parasitic load
26.9MW
CO₂ concentration
15.5%mol%
▸Direct Field Costs$292.9M
Recovery Boiler: booster fan and ductwork—
Lime Kiln: booster fan and ductwork—
Multi-fuel boiler: booster fan and ductwork—
Steam turbine island modifications—
Auxiliary boiler modifications—
Waste waster treatment—
Common flue gas stack—
Direct Contact Cooler—
Amine absorber section—
Amine circulation system—
Stripper section—
CO2 Compression and dehydration—
Auxiliaries—
Other direct material cost—
Construction—
EPC and other costs—
▸Indirect Field Costs—
Report did not provide a further cost breakdown.
▸Contingency & Escalation$29.3M
Contingency—
▸Interest During Construction$47.6M
Report did not provide a further cost breakdown.
▸Owners Cost$33.0M
Report did not provide a further cost breakdown.
Total Capex$402.8M
Technology Centre Mongstad
CO₂ captured
5,658,960t/yr
Capture efficiency
70.0%
Utilization
85.0%
Parasitic load
182MW
CO₂ concentration
12.5%mol%
▸Direct Field Costs$1.65B
Coal & Sorbent Handling Equipment Cost—
Coal & Sorbent Prep & Feed Equipment Cost—
Feedwater & Misc. Balance of Plant Systems Equipment Cost—
Pulverized coal-fired boiler Equipment Cost—
Flue Gas Cleanup Equipment Cost—
CO2 Capture System Equipment Cost—
CO2 Compression and Purification Equipment—
HRSG, Ducting & Stack Equipment Cost—
Steam Turbine Generator Equipment Cost—
Cooling Water System Equipment Cost—
Ash/Spent Sorbent Handling System Equipment Cost—
Accessory Electric Plant Equipment Cost—
Instrumentation & Control Equipment Cost—
Improvements to Site Equipment Cost—
Materials Cost—
Labor—
▸Indirect Field Costs$187.0M
Engineering—
▸Contingency & Escalation$418.3M
Project Contingency—
Process Contingency—
▸Interest During Construction—
Report did not provide a further cost breakdown.
▸Owners Cost$507.6M
Financing Cost—
Pre-production Cost—
Inventory Capital—
Other's owners cost—
Total Capex$3.19B
Southern Company / Plant Barry
CO₂ captured
2,400,000t/yr
Capture efficiency
—
Utilization
95.0%
Parasitic load
—MW
CO₂ concentration
99.0%vol%
▸Direct Field Costs$91.8M
Dehydration—
CO2 Compression Equipment—
Equipment installation, instrumentation and controls, piping, electrical, engineering, construction expenses, contractors’ fees, and process and project contingencies—
▸Indirect Field Costs—
Report did not provide a further cost breakdown.
▸Contingency & Escalation—
Report did not provide a further cost breakdown.
▸Interest During Construction—
Report did not provide a further cost breakdown.
▸Owners Cost—
Report did not provide a further cost breakdown.
Total Capex$91.8M